“LEXICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN THE COMMON EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK OF REFERENCE FOR LANGUAGES AND THE FLESCH-KINCAID”
Keywords:
CEFR, Text Analysis, Flesch-KincaidAbstract
This article presents the results of an exploratory study pertaining to the use of the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) for Languages and its Text Inspector; an automated tool measuring proficiency level, text complexity, and readability. This tool alsoanalysed text based on Flesch reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade. The assessment of the text in the current study is based on seven text parameters: CEFR levels, types, tokens, sentence count, Flesch reading ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grades. Ten academic texts at tertiary level (Essays) were analysed to find how specific parameters collaborate with each other. As shown by the findings, conventional readability equations, such as the Flesch-Kincaid Ease and Grades, are not as accurate predictors of text quality
as are the CEFR text characteristics. A comprehensive approach for selecting appropriate academic texts for a given audience may be strengthened by using the discovered connection between the text complexity characteristics.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF SOCIETY, EDUCATION AND LANGUAGE (PJSEL)Abbreviated KEY Title: Pak. j. soc. educ. lang. (Online) URL: http://pjsel.jehanf.com/archives.php ISSN 2523-1227 (Online), ISSN 2521-8123 (Print
Editor’s Email: editorpjsel@gmail.com Nature of Publication: OPEN ACCESS. Copyright: Copyright (c) 2015-2018
LICENSED BY: THE WORK OF PJSEL IS LICENSED UNDER CREATIVE COMMON ATTRIBUTION 4.0 INTERNATIONAL
